Nancy Pfund’s Remarks at Impact Capital Managers Awards Dinner

February 1, 2024

Thank you so much, this is such a spe­cial hon­or. The ICM com­mu­ni­ty and mis­sion are at the core of what DBL is all about, and so being here, it real­ly feels like we are one big family!

Tonight, I want to share a few brief per­spec­tives on our impact invest­ing jour­ney.  But first, I would like to acknowl­edge and thank sev­er­al peo­ple in this room.  First of all, con­grats to my fel­low hon­orees, Mark and Adri­an­na.  Glad to see the Bay Area Sales­force team here in full force!  And a big thanks to David Kirkpatrick—a fel­low impact pio­neer –for his very kind intro­duc­tion.  To Marieke, Gar­rett, Diane, Ravteg, Eliya and Michaela from ICM, mas­sive thanks for your lead­er­ship and efforts to orga­nize this inspir­ing evening.  And to my col­leagues on the ICM board, kudos for all the work you do on behalf of our mem­ber­ship, and kudos to the amaz­ing mem­bers here tonight who make impact happen!

On a per­son­al lev­el, there were three groups who were piv­otal to cre­at­ing our first dou­ble bot­tom line ven­ture fund, and two of them are here tonight:  I’d like to rec­og­nize and applaud them for tak­ing what was then, a huge risk:  JP Mor­gan, and The Ford Foun­da­tion.  Thank you for being here. I tru­ly believe that many of us, myself includ­ed, would not be here tonight with­out your ear­ly lead­er­ship.  The third group, by the way, is the Bay Area Coun­cil, a region­al busi­ness asso­ci­a­tion that has been around since 1945.  They are not here tonight, but still going strong!  I also want to thank our oth­er LPs in the audi­ence: Gold­man Sachs, Grosvenor, and CalPERS for their sup­port!  We all know how impor­tant strong legal advice is to a ven­ture firm and I would like to thank David Selden and Kat­lyn Kim­ber from Coo­ley for attend­ing, I very much appre­ci­ate the long-time sup­port of DBL from Cooley’s West coast team mem­bers, led by John Dado.  I would also like to give a shout out to Peter David­son from Aligned Cli­mate Cap­i­tal and thank him for his gen­er­ous dona­tion of a slice of his car­ried inter­est to ICM.  Yay! We did this in our first fund and it cre­at­ed a mean­ing­ful boost to the bud­gets of the not-for-prof­its involved.  Also, a big shout out to Maya Choren­gal at TPG and Jes­si­ca Matthews at JP Mor­gan both awe­some impact pio­neers in our midst.

Next, I would like to thank my guests tonight—my DBL col­league, Jake Har­ris, Meade Harris—no relation!—the CEO of Dynamo Ener­gy and the Hawthorn Club, Fran Seeg­ull, anoth­er pio­neer in impact, now lead­ing the U.S. Impact Invest­ing Alliance, Pro­fes­sor Shawn Cole from Har­vard Busi­ness School, one of our most long-stand­ing and effec­tive aca­d­e­m­ic part­ners, and cli­mate investors and entre­pre­neurs Stephan Feil­hauer, Dave Wasser­stein, and Carine Dumit. Final­ly, to all of you who have recent­ly raised a fund in this dif­fi­cult cli­mate, espe­cial­ly a first time fund, we appre­ci­ate you, we con­grat­u­late you, and we def­i­nite­ly feel what you went through to get here!

At DBL, we are cel­e­brat­ing our 20th year this year! If you had told us then, that in 2024 we would be cel­e­brat­ing with 150 like-mind­ed investors in an orga­ni­za­tion that col­lec­tive­ly rep­re­sents over $100 bil­lion in assets under man­age­ment, we would have laughed uncon­trol­lably. The rea­son for this is that in those ear­ly days, we rou­tine­ly thought our port­fo­lio com­pa­nies would not suc­ceed and that we would fail as a result. There was no com­mu­ni­ty to sup­port us, no roadmap, and not only no inter­est in what most of our com­pa­nies were doing, but there was active dis­dain for things like solar pan­els, elec­tric cars, and inter­net music. Of course, the sto­ry end­ed hap­pi­ly, and we went on to raise larg­er funds and become part of a bur­geon­ing impact invest­ing indus­try, but those mem­o­ries will nev­er fade away.

I say this tonight because, in some ways, we’re in a Deja Vu moment. We’re all back­ing inspir­ing entre­pre­neurs aimed at cre­at­ing impact at scale, and yet the head­winds around us can be dizzy­ing. If it isn’t a pro­posed law in New Hamp­shire threat­en­ing to make it a felony to invest state funds using ESG cri­te­ria (Meade – you live in New Hamp­shire, so we’re count­ing on you to please fix this!), then, it’s the threat of rolling back the IRA and under­min­ing the most impor­tant cli­mate invest­ment in our coun­try’s his­to­ry.  And where just a few years ago, pub­lic mar­kets wel­comed ear­li­er stage cli­mate and impact IPO’s, today, investors want ful­ly baked sto­ries, with rev­enue and prof­its to match. In fact, —and this is a bit sober­ing —if Tes­la were try­ing to go pub­lic today, it may not have been able to: remem­ber, in 2010, the year of the Tes­la IPO, there was no Mod­el S, let alone a Mod­el 3, and gigafac­to­ries were still at the dream stage. Rev­enues were $93M and near­ly 10% per­cent of this rev­enue was large­ly pol­i­cy-dri­ven zero-emis­sion-vehi­cle (ZEV) cred­its.  And, there was a net loss of $154M.  Prof­its would not come for anoth­er TEN years.  With­out the pub­lic mar­kets being will­ing to take invest­ment risk on Tes­la, who knows, would we have the elec­tric vehi­cle mar­ket we have today?

I men­tion this not to freak peo­ple out, but rather to say that what we did then to get to a bet­ter place, we can and must con­tin­ue to do today.

In a nut­shell, here are three areas I’d like to sug­gest we pay par­tic­u­lar atten­tion to going forward:

  1. As I just men­tioned in my sto­ry about the ear­ly Tes­la days, pol­i­cy mat­ters. Between ZEV cred­its, incen­tives for plants in Fre­mont and Neva­da, the DOE loan, and solar net ener­gy meter­ing rules, which played a big role in ear­ly solar growth, includ­ing for SolarCi­ty, which Tes­la would go on to acquire – Pol­i­cy Mat­tered! Help­ing to make this pol­i­cy hap­pen took a huge amount of DBL’s time and effort.
  2. Think of pol­i­cy­mak­ers as one of your key stake­hold­ers: respect their man­date, and they will respect yours. In fact, if you uncov­er an under- inno­vat­ed field and get buy-in from pol­i­cy­mak­ers, you can gain a com­pet­i­tive advan­tage. Just a few weeks ago, a few days before Christ­mas – (in fact I remem­ber think­ing I should have been home wrap­ping presents) — Jake and I, instead, trav­eled through a tor­ren­tial thun­der­storm to Sacra­men­to for a meet­ing with the head of California’s Nat­ur­al Resources Agency, Wade Crow­foot, the head of Cal Fire, Joe Tyler and Gayle Miller, the head of finance in the Governor’s cli­mate office, to enlist their sup­port for a brand new, 21st cen­tu­ry approach to fight­ing cat­a­stroph­ic wild­fire. Also at the meet­ing was the CEO of Rain, one of our young but ambi­tious com­pa­nies that is devel­op­ing the soft­ware lay­ers to inte­grate with cam­eras, sen­sors, weath­er and GPS feeds, and the like, com­bine all that with pre­ci­sion fire retar­dant appli­ca­tion, to cre­ate autonomous air­craft that are sta­tioned remote­ly in the woods to get to wild­fires before they get out of con­trol. These sys­tems can also be used to help fire­fight­ers do their crit­i­cal work with increased safe­ty. The jour­ney to Cal Fire and the Governor’s office—without whose sup­port no change would occur– start­ed with the recog­ni­tion that wild­fire sup­pres­sion was not just an adap­ta­tion and resilience strat­e­gy that also helped enable ‘good’ fire, like pre­scribed burns, but was also a car­bon emis­sion  In fact, the car­bon emis­sions from the wild­fires in Cana­da last year were six times greater than the emis­sions of the entire state of Cal­i­for­nia — and this emis­sions trend is get­ting worse, not bet­ter. In fact, if wild­fires were a coun­try, they would rank 4th in emis­sions behind Chi­na, the US and India.  We need new, tech dri­ven approaches…the days of Smokey the Bear as a wild­fire icon are over.  At DBL, we are known for invest­ing in under-inno­vat­ed fields, and when I look at the areas we are invest­ing in today: like wild­fires, and nat­ur­al cli­mate solu­tions, build­ing decar­boniza­tion, ener­gy tran­si­tion, and even home­less­ness – which is a cat­e­go­ry most ven­ture cap­i­tal investors would not touch with a ten foot pole  –  in all these areas, work­ing with pol­i­cy­mak­ers is the name of the game.

Final­ly, don’t for­get the role of incum­bents in pol­i­cy, inno­va­tion, indus­try for­ma­tion and every­thing else. Think of it as a marathon and a chess game at the same time: you’ve got to have stay­ing pow­er and you need to assess strate­gi­cal­ly why incum­bents are react­ing the way they are. When we first start­ed, I was furi­ous because I thought incum­bents were stand­ing in the way of progress. Then I noticed that no mat­ter what the sec­tor, incum­bent reac­tions were usu­al­ly the same: first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they try to squash you, and final­ly they join you! So the trick is not to take it per­son­al­ly, but to real­ize that this is just the way it is. They are cer­tain­ly not haters of the haters got­ta hate vari­ety… they are incum­bents, and incum­bents got­ta encum­ber, at least at first!

Of course, as impact investors, we are expect­ed to change the world for the bet­ter, while excelling at all the tra­di­tion­al tasks of a VC at the same time. For this, I rec­om­mend the old say­ing, ‘don’t let the per­fect be the ene­my of the good’. Do the best that you can and know that you are get­ting bet­ter with each deal that you do and with each fund that you raise. And now, with an orga­ni­za­tion like Impact Cap­i­tal Man­agers, you’ve got 116 mem­bers that have your back! Let’s rely on one anoth­er to build a com­mu­ni­ty of purpose.

Thank you so much for this hon­or.  Remem­ber, we real­ly are just get­ting started!